<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Musings of the Creative Noggins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.creativenoggin.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.creativenoggin.com</link>
	<description>A blog from award winning San Antonio Branding, Advertising and Marketing Agency--Creative Noggin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 19:29:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Customer Evangelism Case Study &#8211; TOMS Shoes by Jeannie</title>
		<link>http://blog.creativenoggin.com/2011/01/14/a-customer-evangelism-case-study-toms-shoes/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeannie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 19:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creativenoggin.com/?p=634#comment-842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spot on with this write-up, I seriously believe this site needs 
a great deal more attention. I&#039;ll probably be returning to read through more, thanks for the advice!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on with this write-up, I seriously believe this site needs<br />
a great deal more attention. I&#8217;ll probably be returning to read through more, thanks for the advice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cameron-Brooks is the best military recruiting agency EVER! by Jason</title>
		<link>http://blog.creativenoggin.com/2009/03/20/cameron-brooks-is-the-best-military-recruiting-agency-ever/#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creativenoggin.com/?p=86#comment-818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree. I&#039;m still in the Army and use FB all the time to stay in touch with friends and family while deployed and while I was stationed in Germany. Actually I think that articles like these help promote Cameron Brooks pretty wall. I&#039;ve been thinking about getting out for awhile and after reading a few reviews about cameron brooks I&#039;m seriously thinking of contacting them.
-Jason]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I&#8217;m still in the Army and use FB all the time to stay in touch with friends and family while deployed and while I was stationed in Germany. Actually I think that articles like these help promote Cameron Brooks pretty wall. I&#8217;ve been thinking about getting out for awhile and after reading a few reviews about cameron brooks I&#8217;m seriously thinking of contacting them.<br />
-Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is a virtual advertising agency anyway? by tracymarlowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.creativenoggin.com/2009/12/02/what-is-a-virtual-advertising-agency-anyway/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tracymarlowe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creativenoggin.com/?p=479#comment-809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Donna,

To my knowledge, there is not an &quot;official roster&quot; or directory of virtual agencies.  If you decide to start one, let us know!  

We get contacted pretty regularly by individuals looking to submit their portfolios.  If you are interested, please send your portfolio to our Creative Director, Trish Rawls at trish@creativenoggin.com.  She stays on top of our network of resources.  

Glad you enjoyed the article.  

Take care,

Tracy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Donna,</p>
<p>To my knowledge, there is not an &#8220;official roster&#8221; or directory of virtual agencies.  If you decide to start one, let us know!  </p>
<p>We get contacted pretty regularly by individuals looking to submit their portfolios.  If you are interested, please send your portfolio to our Creative Director, Trish Rawls at <a href="mailto:trish@creativenoggin.com">trish@creativenoggin.com</a>.  She stays on top of our network of resources.  </p>
<p>Glad you enjoyed the article.  </p>
<p>Take care,</p>
<p>Tracy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is a virtual advertising agency anyway? by Donna Williams</title>
		<link>http://blog.creativenoggin.com/2009/12/02/what-is-a-virtual-advertising-agency-anyway/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donna Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 02:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creativenoggin.com/?p=479#comment-808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Tracy,
I enjoyed your article!  I defected from my executive creative director job eight years ago to open my own solo freelance agency. As a freelance professional, I am happy to hear that there are such things called &quot;virtual agencies,&quot; and that they are doing so well!  I would love to be able to contact some of them to invite them to view my portfolio site, but haven&#039;t had any luck in finding a virtual agency roster.  Does such a thing exist?  

Best regards,
Donna Williams
President/Owner
Pink Fuzzy Slippers, Inc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tracy,<br />
I enjoyed your article!  I defected from my executive creative director job eight years ago to open my own solo freelance agency. As a freelance professional, I am happy to hear that there are such things called &#8220;virtual agencies,&#8221; and that they are doing so well!  I would love to be able to contact some of them to invite them to view my portfolio site, but haven&#8217;t had any luck in finding a virtual agency roster.  Does such a thing exist?  </p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Donna Williams<br />
President/Owner<br />
Pink Fuzzy Slippers, Inc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If Ad Agencies Planned Kids Birthday Parties&#8211;Great AdWeek Video by sararwd</title>
		<link>http://blog.creativenoggin.com/2011/01/17/if-ad-agencies-planned-kids-birthday-parties-great-adweek-video/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sararwd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 02:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creativenoggin.com/?p=642#comment-307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being both a marketer and a mom, I&#039;m almost embarrased to admit how much I relate to this!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being both a marketer and a mom, I&#8217;m almost embarrased to admit how much I relate to this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If Ad Agencies Planned Kids Birthday Parties&#8211;Great AdWeek Video by Andee</title>
		<link>http://blog.creativenoggin.com/2011/01/17/if-ad-agencies-planned-kids-birthday-parties-great-adweek-video/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creativenoggin.com/?p=642#comment-302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It indeed bring a smile to my face...great stuff!  I especially love how attendance went up 40% from 2009. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It indeed bring a smile to my face&#8230;great stuff!  I especially love how attendance went up 40% from 2009. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The logo change heard around the world… and back again by Aura Valeri</title>
		<link>http://blog.creativenoggin.com/2010/10/12/the-logo-change-heard-around-the-world%e2%80%a6-and-back-again/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aura Valeri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 12:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creativenoggin.com/?p=544#comment-295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks for the awsome post. I am going to keep an observation about your own site, i allready bookmarked it to personal list :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks for the awsome post. I am going to keep an observation about your own site, i allready bookmarked it to personal list <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Power of TV Advertising by tracymarlowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.creativenoggin.com/2010/11/10/the-power-of-tv-advertising-san-antonio/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tracymarlowe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creativenoggin.com/?p=596#comment-267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, Fred, as I mentioned, the study does state that 1/3 of television viewing is prerecorded (timeshifted).  But 2/3 of people are still watching live TV.  

You&#039;re right in that mobile and digital usage is way up.  But that doesn&#039;t translate into effective advertising.  People are using the Internet at an incredible rate.  Almost 80% of Americans regularly use the Internet.  Yet studies show that online advertising is still one of the lowest regarded forms of advertising.  Viewers actually rank brands that advertise via mobile and online lower than their print and television counterparts.  Why?  Because they find advertising on these mediums to be the most intrusive.  And the low cost of entry and tendency towards low production values also diminishes the brand perception of advertisers in these mediums.

Basically, to reiterate my point, yes, usage of digital mediums is up.  But usage does not translate into influence when it comes to advertising.  Studies show that television is still an incredibly effective medium with the HIGHEST influence on consumers over all other medium.  

Also, please realize that we don&#039;t have a single client whom we recommend place all of their eggs in one basket.  No one medium will do everything that a client needs.  They must diversify their media in order to make the strongest impact.  We don&#039;t have a single client for whom an online presence is not a part of our overall marketing plan.  That includes websites, mobile marketing, search engine marketing and optimization, social media, and even online advertising for a select number of clients.  And for a select few, for whom it makes sense, it includes television and radio.  Because, again, no other medium is as powerful at driving strong responses from consumers.  

We don&#039;t disagree, that digital is definitely a wave of the future and that clients should definitely consider it in their marketing mix.

But to say hands down that all clients should disregard TV and that everyone should jump on the digital bandwagon and forget all other media is short sighted and not a very calculated move.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Fred, as I mentioned, the study does state that 1/3 of television viewing is prerecorded (timeshifted).  But 2/3 of people are still watching live TV.  </p>
<p>You&#8217;re right in that mobile and digital usage is way up.  But that doesn&#8217;t translate into effective advertising.  People are using the Internet at an incredible rate.  Almost 80% of Americans regularly use the Internet.  Yet studies show that online advertising is still one of the lowest regarded forms of advertising.  Viewers actually rank brands that advertise via mobile and online lower than their print and television counterparts.  Why?  Because they find advertising on these mediums to be the most intrusive.  And the low cost of entry and tendency towards low production values also diminishes the brand perception of advertisers in these mediums.</p>
<p>Basically, to reiterate my point, yes, usage of digital mediums is up.  But usage does not translate into influence when it comes to advertising.  Studies show that television is still an incredibly effective medium with the HIGHEST influence on consumers over all other medium.  </p>
<p>Also, please realize that we don&#8217;t have a single client whom we recommend place all of their eggs in one basket.  No one medium will do everything that a client needs.  They must diversify their media in order to make the strongest impact.  We don&#8217;t have a single client for whom an online presence is not a part of our overall marketing plan.  That includes websites, mobile marketing, search engine marketing and optimization, social media, and even online advertising for a select number of clients.  And for a select few, for whom it makes sense, it includes television and radio.  Because, again, no other medium is as powerful at driving strong responses from consumers.  </p>
<p>We don&#8217;t disagree, that digital is definitely a wave of the future and that clients should definitely consider it in their marketing mix.</p>
<p>But to say hands down that all clients should disregard TV and that everyone should jump on the digital bandwagon and forget all other media is short sighted and not a very calculated move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Power of TV Advertising by Fred</title>
		<link>http://blog.creativenoggin.com/2010/11/10/the-power-of-tv-advertising-san-antonio/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creativenoggin.com/?p=596#comment-266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for your response.

Does this study show that its being recorded vs watched live?  My son said to me the other day when a commercial was playing as I walked away.....&quot;Daddy, fast forward this.&quot;

Commercials are quickly becoming a thing of the past.  Attention is at an all time low and if you don&#039;t tell me now then I&#039;m not listening.  My point to my statement is putting any money into television advertising is pointing someone in the wrong direction.  Neilsen just reported that over 50% of wireless subscribers own a smart phone which is up 14% from 2 years ago.

My point is that instead of pointing someone into making a commercial with that money.  I think you should point them into the digital, mobile, and interactive route.  This would be best for your clients long term growth and would catapult them above their competition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your response.</p>
<p>Does this study show that its being recorded vs watched live?  My son said to me the other day when a commercial was playing as I walked away&#8230;..&#8221;Daddy, fast forward this.&#8221;</p>
<p>Commercials are quickly becoming a thing of the past.  Attention is at an all time low and if you don&#8217;t tell me now then I&#8217;m not listening.  My point to my statement is putting any money into television advertising is pointing someone in the wrong direction.  Neilsen just reported that over 50% of wireless subscribers own a smart phone which is up 14% from 2 years ago.</p>
<p>My point is that instead of pointing someone into making a commercial with that money.  I think you should point them into the digital, mobile, and interactive route.  This would be best for your clients long term growth and would catapult them above their competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Power of TV Advertising by tracymarlowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.creativenoggin.com/2010/11/10/the-power-of-tv-advertising-san-antonio/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tracymarlowe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.creativenoggin.com/?p=596#comment-265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay Fred, here are some stats.

Your comment says that TV is down.  But &lt;a href=&quot;http://en-us.nielsen.com/content/dam/nielsen/en_us/documents/pdf/White%20Papers%20and%20Reports/Nielsen_Three%20Screen%20Report_Q12010.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recent Nielsen studies&lt;/a&gt; show that actually TV usage is UP and continuing to grow.  Yes mobile and internet usage is up too, but Americans are also watching more TV than every before.  The average American watches two hours more TV per month just comparing 2010 to 2009.   

While yes, DVR usage is up.  But still, only a third of viewers are currently watching timeshifted television.  That leaves the remaining viewership to be watching live TV.

And a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.warc.com/News/TopNews.asp?ID=27385&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;study conducted in October 2010&lt;/a&gt; shows that television is still the most influential form of advertising.  I was able to find numerous other studies supporting that.  

Mobile advertising is currently a growing trend, and studies do show that it is more impactful than online banner advertisement, which has not shown to be as inspiring as mobile, print or television.  I do believe mobile has merit but it is still an emerging form of advertising which requires some creative planning, and works better for some clients than others.  As it is working out the kinks and developing into a legitimate, trackable form of advertising, there are hot ideas like Geo-based target marketing (location based marketing) that aren&#039;t working as well in practice as they do in theory.  Not to say that they can&#039;t and won&#039;t.  But it is still a developing medium with few statistics to back it up as far as the impact it makes on the consumer and driving brand preference.  

Fred, the point of my comment was not to say that my clients should do TV advertising before all other mediums.  We have plenty of clients and television is right for very few of them.  But merely to say that the television commercial is long from dead and that television is still a very persuasive medium not to be ignored.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay Fred, here are some stats.</p>
<p>Your comment says that TV is down.  But <a href="http://en-us.nielsen.com/content/dam/nielsen/en_us/documents/pdf/White%20Papers%20and%20Reports/Nielsen_Three%20Screen%20Report_Q12010.pdf" rel="nofollow">recent Nielsen studies</a> show that actually TV usage is UP and continuing to grow.  Yes mobile and internet usage is up too, but Americans are also watching more TV than every before.  The average American watches two hours more TV per month just comparing 2010 to 2009.   </p>
<p>While yes, DVR usage is up.  But still, only a third of viewers are currently watching timeshifted television.  That leaves the remaining viewership to be watching live TV.</p>
<p>And a <a href="http://www.warc.com/News/TopNews.asp?ID=27385" rel="nofollow">study conducted in October 2010</a> shows that television is still the most influential form of advertising.  I was able to find numerous other studies supporting that.  </p>
<p>Mobile advertising is currently a growing trend, and studies do show that it is more impactful than online banner advertisement, which has not shown to be as inspiring as mobile, print or television.  I do believe mobile has merit but it is still an emerging form of advertising which requires some creative planning, and works better for some clients than others.  As it is working out the kinks and developing into a legitimate, trackable form of advertising, there are hot ideas like Geo-based target marketing (location based marketing) that aren&#8217;t working as well in practice as they do in theory.  Not to say that they can&#8217;t and won&#8217;t.  But it is still a developing medium with few statistics to back it up as far as the impact it makes on the consumer and driving brand preference.  </p>
<p>Fred, the point of my comment was not to say that my clients should do TV advertising before all other mediums.  We have plenty of clients and television is right for very few of them.  But merely to say that the television commercial is long from dead and that television is still a very persuasive medium not to be ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>